Lawsuit: Dismissed RealImza v. Crown, Case 1 (Ch. 2025)

[RealImza]

In the Chancery of the Kingdom of Alexandria
RealImza (Possible Citizen)

V.

The Crown Of WackJap The Bald The Great

The existing constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria raises concerns related to citizenship, as it lacks a clear definition and criteria for granting citizenship. This ambiguity creates a situation where the Kingdom could potentially deny certain rights to its residents. This uncertainty surrounding citizenship not only affects the legal status of individuals but also has broader implications for the democratic principles and social structures within the Kingdom. Clarifying and establishing a comprehensive framework for citizenship rights is crucial to ensure fairness and equality for all inhabitants of Alexandria.


Facts:
I - The existing constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria lacks a clear definition and criteria for granting citizenship.
II - This ambiguity creates a situation where the Kingdom could potentially deny certain rights to its residents.


Claims For Relief:
I - Per the General Court Rules and Procedures, If a citizen has “a genuine interest as a citizen and there are no reasonable and effective alternative means to challenge the law.” then they have a standing application to pursue a case.
II - The Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria gives exclusive jurisdictions to the High Court over “constitutional questions, including the interpretation and application of the Constitution.”

Prayer for Relief:
1 - A declaration that the Plaintiff qualifies as a Citizen.
2. An Order that the Plaintiff be declared a Citizen of the Kingdom of Alexandria, with all the rights prescribed in the Constitution.
3. That the court set this case as precedent and a guide regarding citizenship.



Long live Alexandria
God Save WackJap.
Iustitia pretium nullum extollit, nec pretium ullum quaerit; ipsa ergo quaeritur propter se.

Filed on the Ides of April, in the 2778th Year Ab Urbe Condita

 

[TheStormcrafter]

We, the currently forming party "Alliance 25 / The Greens for Alexandria" are in favor of rewriting parts of the constitution to make it clearer and more resistant. We want to applaud you for your initiative seeking to better our nation.
Yours sincerely,
TheStormcrafter

 

[Smallfries]

We, the currently forming party "Alliance 25 / The Greens for Alexandria" are in favor of rewriting parts of the constitution to make it clearer and more resistant. We want to applaud you for your initiative seeking to better our nation.
Yours sincerely,
TheStormcrafter

BY ORDER OF THE CHANCERY​

TheStormcrafter is hereby charged with contempt of the Court for speaking out of turn and in a proceeding in which they were not invited.

The charged shall be fined £100, to be paid to the Chancery of Alexandria.

Regi Salutem, Patriae Felicitatem, et Omnibus Iusticiam.​

 

[Greenish9]

In the Chancery of the Kingdom of Alexandria
ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL
Lack of Claim and Application of Writ

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. As the General Court Rules and Procedures state, if a citizen that has not been subject to injury wishes to challenge a law then there must be "no reasonable and effective means to challenge the law." However, the Immigration and Citizenship Act which was proposed to the Parliament creates a reasonable and effective means to challenge the law that the Plaintiff has a genuine interest against. This demonstrates a need for dismissal pursuant of a claim of relief with insufficient evidence.
2. The Defense also challenges the Plaintiff's prayers for relief under the Application of Writ. This is because the individual granting of citizenship would not remedy the alleged structural issue of the constitution lacking a "clear definition and criteria for granting citizenship" nor a potential withholding of rights because of this alleged issue.

We request the Court dismiss this complaint with Prejudice

Greenish9
Crown Counsel of His Excellency King WackJap
Dura Lex, Sed Lex​

 

[Smallfries]

In the Chancery of the Kingdom of Alexandria
ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL
Lack of Claim and Application of Writ

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. As the General Court Rules and Procedures state, if a citizen that has not been subject to injury wishes to challenge a law then there must be "no reasonable and effective means to challenge the law." However, the Immigration and Citizenship Act which was proposed to the Parliament creates a reasonable and effective means to challenge the law that the Plaintiff has a genuine interest against. This demonstrates a need for dismissal pursuant of a claim of relief with insufficient evidence.
2. The Defense also challenges the Plaintiff's prayers for relief under the Application of Writ. This is because the individual granting of citizenship would not remedy the alleged structural issue of the constitution lacking a "clear definition and criteria for granting citizenship" nor a potential withholding of rights because of this alleged issue.

We request the Court dismiss this complaint with Prejudice

Greenish9
Crown Counsel of His Excellency King WackJap
Dura Lex, Sed Lex​

The Good Sir is asked to provide proof of his credentials in service to the Crown.

 

[Real42]

I, Minister of Justice TheReal42Person, do confirm that Greenish9 is serving as an agent of the Ministry of Justice.

 

[Smallfries]

I, Minister of Justice TheReal42Person, do confirm that Greenish9 is serving as an agent of the Ministry of Justice.

So noted.

In the Chancery of the Kingdom of Alexandria
ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL
Lack of Claim and Application of Writ

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. As the General Court Rules and Procedures state, if a citizen that has not been subject to injury wishes to challenge a law then there must be "no reasonable and effective means to challenge the law." However, the Immigration and Citizenship Act which was proposed to the Parliament creates a reasonable and effective means to challenge the law that the Plaintiff has a genuine interest against. This demonstrates a need for dismissal pursuant of a claim of relief with insufficient evidence.
2. The Defense also challenges the Plaintiff's prayers for relief under the Application of Writ. This is because the individual granting of citizenship would not remedy the alleged structural issue of the constitution lacking a "clear definition and criteria for granting citizenship" nor a potential withholding of rights because of this alleged issue.

We request the Court dismiss this complaint with Prejudice

Greenish9
Crown Counsel of His Excellency King WackJap
Dura Lex, Sed Lex​

CHANCERY OF ALEXANDRIA​

WRIT OF DISMISSAL​

The question of "Who is a citizen?" is one of great import that should have been addressed in the Constitution itself. However, the Chancery does not see the need to grant an answer to this question at this time.

We in the Chancery agree that this matter does hold sufficient standing at this time to withstand scrutiny and command the attention of the Court. We agree with Crown Counsel that it seems untrue that there is no reasonable and effective means to challenge the law. Here, it is not only true that the very recent founding of our Nation should afford some leniency as to righting the various wrongs that may exist; but further the fact that a proposal within Parliament has been brought that clarifies this question soundly fails the test of having a reasonable and effective means to challenge the law.

This dismissal should not be interpreted as a refusal by the Courts to challenge the Government in their duties as steward of the State. However, the Judiciary is not a club with which to bludgeon the infantile and immature political apparatus we find ourselves under at this present moment. Put simply, this issue is one that has not directly harmed the Petitioner, nor is it one that has no reasonable and effective method of challenging, as the Government intuitively can—and has—demonstrated.

The Chancery may in the future entertain motions such as this. For the time being, however, would-be Petitioners must stand firm and weather out the storm as we all find our footing in this new land.

This complaint is dismissed.

Regi Salutem, Patriae Felicitatem, et Omnibus Iusticiam.​